Sunday, February 17, 2013

Zero Dark Thirty


First of all I’d like to apologize for my infrequent posts, but things are kind of busy in my life. Luckily, I return with a long overdue review of what I consider to easily be the best film of last year.

Kathryn Bigelow has been on the fast track to Hollywood success since her out of nowhere military masterpiece The Hurt Locker, and since she knocked it out of the park with a film that showed audiences a side of war that they had never even imagined, it’s hard to think that lightning could strike twice with her desire to make a film about the most legendary manhunt in human history. But lo and behold, Bigelow delivers once again with an amazing story of a group of American heroes that we can never truly know about, mostly because a group of more visible Americans couldn’t wait to grab credit for that famous raid.

Now apparently there is a rumor in Hollywood that following her success with The Hurt Locker Bigelow wanted to make a film about the hunt for Bin Laden to showcase the amazing true story behind the operation. So she began to make her movie, but when president Obama’s administration got wind of this they began to pressure her and the studios to really elaborate how involved Obama was in the manhunt , to add more scenes of the president looking badass, and push the release date up to late October just in time for the elections. Bigelow initially agreed, but in secret actually removed any positive portrayal of the president or his administration and maintained the December/January timeline because she didn’t enjoy the disrespectful pressure being put on her.

Now again, this is just a Hollywood rumor, but when watching this movie it’s hard not to believe that this story or something very similar to it occurred during the filming. The presidential administration is mentioned very little throughout the film, and when we do see them they are portrayed as blithering idiots, useless bureaucrats, or just regarded with disdain by the main characters. At one point in the film (which occurs when Bush was leaving the White House and Obama was being sworn in) one of the main characters remarks to another that “our new boss isn’t going to protect us like our last one”, implying that the new president would be targeting defense personnel he didn’t agree with. There are countless other inferences, but it’s quite apparent that the talented Bigelow is not a fan of Washington politics, instead focusing on the hard work done by those in the Department of Defense.

One thing I should bring up right away is the opening, in which the director decided that in order to really take the audience back to a time where we truly hated Bin Laden she had to take us back to the World Trade Center attack. Now as soon as I saw the “September 11, 2001” flash across the screen the first thought in my head was “Oh no… not this again”. I consider it the oldest and most insulting tactic to bring up September 11th to elicit emotions from the audience, especially in films where it’s not even relevant to the plot.

Remember that Tom Hanks film Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close? You know, that subpar film that revolved around a kid trying to piece together his dead father’s last wishes? They could have had dear old Papa Hanks bite the farm in any number of ways, mugging gone wrong, car accident, disease, but nah… that wouldn’t manipulate the audience’s emotions enough. So the writers decided to take the easiest and laziest approach they could and put him smack dab in the middle of the World Trade Center, a decision that wasn’t necessary to the plot in any possible way or contribute to the story at all. It was a cheap trick to cash in on the most horrific event to take place in the audience’s memory just to manipulate them into feeling sadness from remembering that day, and then in turn think that the film was what caused them to feel that sadness and mistake genuine mourning for good direction.

Another horrendously offensive case is the lesser known Robert Pattison film Remember Me, which is completely unremarkable in pretty much every way. The producers seemed to know this, so they tacked on the most disrespectful death scene imaginable by having the main character die in the September 11th attacks… in a film that was made almost ten years after the event… and takes place at that time for no reason other than to exploit that event to manipulate the audiences feelings. It’s called Emotional Disassociation, and it’s the oldest trick in the Hollywood manipulation machine. It’s the same logic behind why people who share a near death experience think they are in love, they mistake the rush of adrenaline and heightened heartbeat as arousal to each other when it actually stems from the excitement of the moment.

But back to the point, when I saw those words flash on screen I almost hated the film right off the bat. Luckily, this film doesn’t try to exploit the event, it just does this to remind the audience of why we are in this massive manhunt in the first place. No cheesy CG re-enactment of planes crashing, no stock footage of the towers coming down, just darkness on the screen as actual terrifying 911 calls are played for about 30-45 seconds. Believe me, if there was even a whiff of disrespect in this scene I would have cried foul faster than anyone, but it’s actually handled with respect and dignity, and in no way exploits the events of that day.

The story follows the story of a woman only known as “Maya”, a CIA operative who spends almost ten years of her life tracking down Osama Bin Laden from the ground up. For obvious security reasons no one can be sure how much of this story is legitimate and how much is “Hollywood-ized”, but what is known (and professed by countless people in the Department of Defense) is that this woman in real life was almost single-handedly responsible for tracking down Osama Bin Laden and arranging the attack that many in Washington would later claim credit for.

What makes this story interesting is that it manages to “Forrest Gump” Maya’s tenuous journey on her massive manhunt by placing her in several real life terrorist events that occurred in real life. While I can’t be sure what events Maya was actually involved in and which are thrown in for drama are unclear, but including them in the film is a great idea because it will show the audience tragic events that the general audience will have no idea even happened. I mean, who had time to care about the Islamabad Marriott bombing when Mad Men was busy winning all the Emmys that night? And really… who should give a crap about the tragic Camp Chapman suicide bomb that claimed so many American lives when Lady Gaga was so busy making headlines with her meat dress or whatever.

Another thing I loved about this film was how it portrayed the jobs of these front line patriots, defense workers, soldiers, and other unsung heroes who risk their lives doing what must be done, and then facing the wrath of politicians when things don’t go their way. Countless times we see good people being crucified by their bosses or their own citizens for actions that saved countless lives, and I’m not even talking about torture here. One of the most dynamic things about Maya in the film was that she refused to relent on her pursuit of Bin Laden even when her supervisors told her that the heads in DC weren’t interested in her anymore. He even goes out of his way to mention how further pursuit of him would result in her career being hacked off at the knees. Politics is a dangerous and disgusting game, and this film does an amazing job of showing how it’s played.

The reason I keep bringing politics into this review is the fact that this is one of the few films out there to really show how screwed up the system (particularly this current administration) really is. Most Hollywood rush jobs would do a swell job delivering emotionally manipulative dialogue to a loud booming score to get the audiences blood pumping, but never once even breach the topic of politics in the military even when the film is about politics in the military. Hollywood prefers safe, kosher, easy to digest happy films that never really make the audience actually think for themselves. I’m all for an enjoyable popcorn chomping film, but they shouldn’t be the highest grossing films in the market. Don’t agree with me? Then why are Titanic and Avatar the highest grossing films of all time? It’s because they are very vanilla and are exceptionally mediocre, the epitome of 70% all around.

Now back to my personal favorite part of the movie, the actual raid. At first I thought that this scene was going to dive into the Hollywood schlock machine with overly long action scenes of Star Spangled ‘splosions, but the film actually plays the scene incredibly straight. There aren’t any scenes of unrealistic superhero moves or gun-fu, just straight up professional military movements supplemented with quick, crisp shots and fantastic cinematography.

I can sing praise for this film al day, but I’ll limit myself to two more things about the film that really blew me away. The film is chock full of fantastic performances, particularly from Mark Strong and relative newcomer Jessica Chastain, but fully stealing the show was the amazing turn in from the normally comedic Chris Pratt.  Pratt is best known to audiences as the lovable Andy from Parks and Recreation, but after beefing up and working on his badass chops he comes across as a totally believable and convincing SEAL team leader. Watching him deliver a performance like this after being established as a talented comedic treasure reminds me of when people began to realize Woody Harrelson was a fantastic actor after seeing him on Cheers for so many years. To see the man transition from this…


 
 
To this...
 
 

 

 So seamlessly is remarkable, reminding me of other versatile actors such as Gary Oldman and Paul Giamatti. It’s always great to see talent emerging in Hollywood, and I expect great things from the talented Mr. Pratt.

The second thing that I loved about this film (and already brought up in my last article) was the raid itself. While most action films go out of their way to show America as the good guys, Bigelow shows the more realistic approach without ever delving into making the SEALs look ruthless or cruel. I don’t want to ruin the sequence for those of you who haven’t seen it, but several instances in the scene show how these elite operatives will do everything they can to avoid unnecessary collateral damage while not hesitating to pull the trigger on anyone they deem a threat. It’s a brutally real shootout, and it manages to demonstrate the necessity of these actions without ever being disrespectful to operatives themselves.

This film is one of the best examples of how to create art out of real life in a film. It’s not afraid to take risks with the material or hurt people’s feelings in the process, and it’s such a breath of fresh air to see something like this come out in Hollywood once in a while. I can guarantee this film isn’t going to win many Oscars this year, not because it doesn’t deserve them, but because it didn’t bring up any hot issues at the moment (I guarantee the mediocre Silver Linings Playbook will walk away with all the awards this year because it is about mental illness) and the director probably burned a lot of bridges with people in Hollywood. Don’t go into this film expecting a “Rah Rah! Go America!” type of film, but instead expect a movie that will make you look at the necessity of heroes like Maya, her tactics, and the clandestine services in general.
 

10 out of 10